Never forget, Bill Gates’ infamous Blue Screen of…








The following article presented by Vigilant Citizen:


Bill Gates recently stated on Reddit that “digital certificates” will be used to identify who received the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine. And these certificates will also be used to identify who can conduct business or not. Here’s how this plan is already backed by a massive organization called ID2020.

For years, Bill Gates has been at the forefront of research regarding global pandemics and mass vaccination campaigns. In the past decade, Gates went on record several times stating that the world was not ready for a global pandemic.

In October 2019 (only a few months before the apparition of COVID-19) the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (in cooperation with the World Economic Forum) hosted Event 201, a 3.5-hour table-top simulation of a global pandemic.

Oddly enough, this simulation was about a novel coronavirus that would kill millions. About eight weeks later, an actual novel coronavirus spurred in China. This lead to some people wondering if this exercise actually predicted the spread of COVID-19. In response to these questions, a statement was posted on the Event 201 website.

Statement about nCoV and our pandemic exercise

In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted a pandemic tabletop exercise called Event 201 with partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Recently, the Center for Health Security has received questions about whether that pandemic exercise predicted the current novel coronavirus outbreak in China. To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction. Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic. We are not now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will kill 65 million people. Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019.

On March 13th, about a day after COVID-19 began shutting down the entire Western world, Bill Gates stepped down from the public board of Microsoft to “dedicate more time to philanthropic priorities including global health and development, education, and climate change”. As the pandemic spread across the world, Gates became an outspoken and authoritative figure on the pandemic crisis, appearing all over mass media to share his views and recommendations.

On March 18th, Bill Gates took part in an AMA (Ask Me Anything) on Reddit titled I’m Bill Gates, co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. AMA about COVID-19. where he answered questions about the pandemic. In one of his answers, Gates referred to a “digital certificate” to keep track of who got vaccinated.

A Reddit user named RemoteControlledUser asked this question:

What changes are we going to have to make to how businesses operate to maintain our economy while providing social distancing?

Bill Gates’ answer:

The question of which businesses should keep going is tricky. Certainly food supply and the health system. We still need water, electricity and the internet. Supply chains for critical things need to be maintained. Countries are still figuring out what to keep running.

Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it.

While most of Gates’ answers were received with praise, this one raised lots of eyebrows. The most upvoted reply highlights the similarities between Gates’ solution and the “Mark of the Beast” in the Bible.

This concept of a “digital certificate” to store medical information (including vaccines received) and to grant access to rights or services was not a mere suggestion. It is part of a massive project that is propelled by a powerful group called ID2020 which is backed by the United Nations, the Rockefeller Foundation and … Bill Gates’ Microsoft.


Simply put, ID2020 is looking to create a digital identification system that would store a wealth of personal information and that would go beyond the limits of national governments. The official website of ID2020 states that a global digital identity is necessary to keep track of refugees and ID-less people in developing countries. Of course, people in developed countries would be ID-ed as well. The website states:

We Need to Get Digital ID Right

Unfortunately, current models of digital ID do not meet everyone’s needs. They are generally archaic, insecure, lacking adequate privacy protection, and for over a billion people worldwide, unavailable.

Everyone should have access to a digital ID that enables them to prove who they are across institutional and international borders and across time, while giving them control over how their personal information is collected, used, and shared.

In an article published by ID2020 in 2018, vaccines are the perfect way to introduce digital identity to the world – especially infants. Appropriately titled Immunization: an entry point for digital identity, the article states:

Because immunization is conducted in infancy, providing children with a digital child health card would give them a unique, portable digital identity early in life. And as children grow, their digital child health card can be used to access secondary services, such as primary school, or ease the process of obtaining alternative credentials. Effectively the child health card becomes the first step in establishing a legal, broadly recognized identity.

In short, according to ID2020, vaccinations are the perfect opportunity to introduce a digital ID that would store the medical history of each individual. This identity would also be used to grant access to basic rights and services.

ID2020 is already testing the introduction of digital IDs in Bangladesh. On August 2019, ID2020 published a “Request for information” article stating:

A2i and its partners Gavi and ID2020 are committed to jointly researching and implementing a unique ID for infants through digitisation of vaccination processes in Bangladesh.

The program will provide infants and children with a portable, biometrically-linked digital ID either at the point of birth registration or at the time of their immunizations, simultaneously supporting three shared objectives:

Driving improvements in CRVS (Demographic and Social Statistics) coverage and process

Supporting improvements in vaccination process and equity

Ultimately, supporting access to rights and services throughout one’s life-course.

In this Bangladesh experiment, digital ID is “biometrically-linked”, meaning that it is based on the fingerprints of individuals. The article describes the process in place:

Information is required regarding biometric scanners capable of capturing the fingerprint biometrics of parents during phase 1 with the ambition to also effectively capture infant biometrics in phase 2. Scanners can be cabled or Bluetooth. Scanners must be a minimum of FBI certified FAP30, portable, robust and capturing a minimum of 500 pixels per inch. Please state the port type on the scanner(s), for example, micro USB, USB C, or other.

While this project is linked to biometrics, Bill Gates has been funding research on a different form of vaccine identification: The quantum dot tattoo.

Quantum Dot Tattoo

In December 2019, a group of researchers at the MIT published a study in Science Translational Medicine about the use of quantum dot tattoos to identify who people who received a vaccine.

An article in Futurism titled An Invisible Quantum Dot ‘Tattoo’ Could Be Used to ID Vaccinated Kids reviewed this study:

For the people overseeing nationwide vaccination initiatives in developing countries, keeping track of who had which vaccination and when can be a tough task.

But researchers from MIT might have a solution: they’ve created an ink that can be safely embedded in the skin alongside the vaccine itself, and it’s only visible using a special smartphone camera app and filter.

In other words, they’ve found a covert way to embed the record of a vaccination directly in a patient’s skin rather than documenting it electronically or on paper – and their low-risk tracking system could greatly simplify the process of maintaining accurate vaccine records, especially on a larger scale.


The invisible “tattoo” accompanying the vaccine is a pattern made up of minuscule quantum dots – tiny semiconducting crystals that reflect light – that glows under infrared light. The pattern – and vaccine – gets delivered into the skin using hi-tech dissolvable microneedles made of a mixture of polymers and sugar.

“It’s possible someday that this ‘invisible’ approach could create new possibilities for data storage, biosensing, and vaccine applications that could improve how medical care is provided, particularly in the developing world,” MIT professor and senior author Robert Langer said in the statement.

The article states that this study was the result of a direct request from Bill Gates.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded the team’s research, which was published in the journal Science Translational Medicine on Wednesday.

According to a Scientific American story, the project came about following a direct request from Microsoft founder Bill Gates himself, who has been personally involved in efforts to eradicate polio and measles through vaccinations.


In Conclusion

While answering a question about conducting business in the era of social distancing, Bill Gates replied that “digital certificates” will be used to determine who had COVID-19, who recovered from it, who was recently tested for it and who received the vaccine. This short (and unexpected answer) opened a gigantic pandora box of what could be in store in the near future: The inevitable mass vaccination campaign to eradicate COVID-19 would be the perfect opportunity to introduce a worldwide digital ID. This system would store a wealth of information about each individual (including vaccination history) and would be used to grant access to rights and services. Although Gates did not go into specifics, “digital certificates” could be linked to biometrics or a quantum dot tattoo.

Considering the fact that this entire project is eerily reminiscent to a passage in the Book of Revelation (a Mark of the Beast that is received on the “right hand or forehead” and that is required “to buy or to sell”), the introduction of such a system would most likely be received with a great deal of resistance. And not only from religious people.










If Bill Gates refuses to vaccinate himself and his own children, then why would you trust anything coming from this NWO Globalist and agent of death.



A message to those positive groups who oppose this evil:








Black Sun symbol hidden within the NAZI Swastika in Germany WWII

Original Photo

Distinguishing the difference between the BLACK SUN and a SUN symbol


SECOND DEBATES (Night One: July 30, 2019)

Click for full size image

Symbolism does not lie,
reflections with every Democrat Candidate.

From left, Marianne Williamson, Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Ohio, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke, former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, former Maryland Rep. John Delaney and Montana Gov. Steve Bullock take the stage for the first of two Democratic presidential primary debates hosted by CNN Tuesday, July 30, 2019, in the Fox Theatre in Detroit.

The Democratic Party’s second presidential debates ahead of the 2020 U.S. presidential election were held on July 30 and 31, 2019, in Detroit, Michigan.

Starting at 8:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, they aired on CNN and were broadcast on radio by Westwood One. Jake Tapper was the lead moderator of the debates, joined by Dana Bash and Don Lemon.

The drawing of lots among the 20 invited candidates to determine when they will debate was televised in prime time on July 18. There were three tiers of candidates that were split between two nights, as opposed to the two tiers used in the first debates.

In total, 21 candidates qualified for the second debate. The 14 candidates who met both criteria (Biden, Sanders, Warren, Harris, Buttigieg, O’Rourke, Booker, Klobuchar, Castro, Yang, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Inslee, and Williamson) and the six candidates who met the polling criterion only (Ryan, Hickenlooper, Delaney, de Blasio, Bennet, and Bullock) were invited to participate in the debate. Gravel, the one candidate to qualify by the donor criterion only, was not invited because of the 20-candidate limit and the polling criterion’s precedence over the donor criterion as mandated by the DNC. The set of participants for the second debate was identical to the first debates with one exception: Bullock replaced Swalwell, who suspended his campaign between the first and second debates.

The debate on July 30 featured Bullock, Buttigieg, Delaney, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, O’Rourke, Ryan, Sanders, Warren and Williamson, while the
debate on July 31 featured Bennet, Biden, Booker, Castro, de Blasio, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Harris, Inslee and Yang. Both debates took place at the Fox Theatre in Detroit, Michigan.

The overarching theme on the first night was a clash between moderates and progressives on a variety of issues, ranging from Medicare for All to electability. CNN received criticism for allegedly inciting conflicts between candidates and making questions from Republican talking points, as well as enforcing the time limits too strictly. The second night saw significant discussion centered on candidates’ differing health care plans. Additionally, Gabbard went on the offensive against Harris.


Night Two (July 31, 2019)


Can you see the BLACK SUN now?


Symbolism does not lie, the Democrats are all under control.

Night Two’s debate on July 31 featured Bennet, Biden, Booker, Castro, de Blasio, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Harris, Inslee and Yang.






The 13th Doctor’s TARDIS Interior

Click image for full size

BBC Promotional Photo of the 13th Doctor’s TARDIS Interior.


Subliminal Illuminati symbol
encoded into the promotional photo

Click image for full size


by MaestroDraven (Amazon Canada Customer Review)

Published: January 16, 2019

There’s really very little to say about series 11 of Doctor Who that hasn’t already been said by the overwhelming majority of fans, but I’ll do my best to break down what’s really going on here, in case any of you haven’t kept your sonic screwdrivers to the ground.

Chris Chibnall’s Doctor Who: Series 11 & 12
Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score

Click image for full size

Doctor Who is dead.

Yes, I said it, because it’s true. As the BBC increasingly moves to the extreme radical Left in an effort to brainwash the U.K. population, they are turning every single program into a vehicle for their specific political and social views. The latest to fall victim to this unfortunate trend is our beloved Doctor, who has spent over 55 years entertaining us on wild and crazy voyages, only to now be reduced to a virtual check-list of Left wing propaganda talking points. In case you’re not keen on politics these days, the premise is simple. There’s a culture war going on between traditional, rational views that we’ve held onto for literally decades, and a small (but very loud) minority of extremist radicals who are out to tell you what an awful person you are (especially if you don’t agree with them), and why/how you should mend your ways. This is called the SJW (social justice warrior) culture. In an effort to turn the world into the miserable fascist state that they desire so earnestly for it to be, they are quite willing to destroy everything you and I hold dear, all in the name of “wokeness,” a skewed and distorted version of reality that makes otherwise normal people say and do outlandish, insane things.

Doctor Who has been riding a steady trend towards SJW propaganda for a while now, culminating to near-fruition with Peter Capaldi’s run as the Time Lord. Series 11 takes it to a whole new stratosphere, eschewing otherwise sidelined social commentary in favor of blatant, direct and in-your-face Leftist arguing points designed to choke all the enjoyment and fun out of a campy, crazy sci-fi show, in favor of “I’m better than you” finger-wagging. When news broke that the new Doctor would be female, many on the conservative side of the thinking pool knew what was inevitably going to happen, and none of it was good. Is it because of the gender change? No. In fact, ratings for the 1st episode of the series ran nearly 11 million viewers, which proved irrefutably that everyone was willing to give a female Doctor a go. After all, why not? This being changes forms all the time. Under normal circumstances (and more than 10 years ago) this shake-up could have proven highly imaginative and very entertaining by changing the status quo for the fun of it. Alas, everyone knew that the BBC and new showrunner Chris Chibnall had other plans.

Chibnall’s hypocrisy on this issue has now become legendary within the space of a few months. At first, he denied any extreme Leftist social commentary in the episodes, only to retract his original stance and admit it openly (and angrily) when fan backlash began to cause a severe ratings drop from nearly 11 million viewers down to almost 5 million, all within the space of several episodes. Chibnall made things much worse for himself by declaring (again, angrily) that the show would feature no classic monsters, a fact which he reiterated several times in frustration. It’s interesting to note that the series’ last episode was a Dalek story, and the reason is obvious: everyone is panicking.

A big part of the failure of series 11 has to do with Jodie Whittaker’s performance as the Doctor. Her gender has no bearing on her ability to play the role. She’s simply not making the role her own. Whittaker steals (wholesale) entire elements from David Tennant and Matt Smith’s respective Doctors without injecting anything of herself into the role. Throughout the series run, Whittaker is handed awful script, after awful script, and forced to feign surprise or fire off another goofy, gnarled facial expression. It’s nothing we haven’t seen before. A female Doctor could have given a fresh new perspective on a legendary character, but what’s on screen is schizophrenic identity theft. Whittaker might have been forgiven for being handed awful scripts and dialogue, if it weren’t for the fact that she went off and criticized fans of the series for their rejection of the character. If the fans aren’t happy, it’s best not to agitate them by calling them names and playing the old Leftist card of labeling people who don’t agree with your politics. Indeed, one of Whittaker’s most awful, racist and misandrist comments came when she proclaimed that for over 50 years, the Doctor has been viewing the universe through the “white male gaze.” Not only is this absolutely preposterous, but it’s arrogant, vulgar and pretentious.

Character nitpicking aside, let’s examine the themes running through Series 11 of Doctor Who.


The female Doctor’s first outing could have been hailed as a fantastic opportunity to showcase a post-regeneration Doctor through a whole new perspective. Unfortunately, SJW politics overrides that function by introducing hand-picked minority companions (now called “friends” according to executive producer Matt Strevens……if you can believe it!) who are all part of an identity politics check-list, with no discernible reason. As is customary with extreme Leftist ideology however, all the men, regardless of their race must be bumbling, inept cowards, while all the women must be hyper-aggressive superheroes who leap into the fray like Marines on a battlefield.


A boring, contrived, go-nowhere story is made worse by anti-gun politics in perhaps one of the most ridiculous and self-defeating arguments ever written in favor of gun control. If the show’s producers want to bash guns, it might help not to give one to a male character who you’ve written from the onset to be a buffoon with no combat training.

11×03 – ROSA

Perhaps the series’ most ill-conceived episode involves examining the story of Rosa Parks and the period of intense racism the United States was plagued with at the time. What could have been an educational take on a good sci-fi plot was totally ruined by the fact that the writers saw fit to demonize every single white person in the episode as a horrible, irredeemable racist, while simultaneously taking a jab at the current state of U.S. social issues and politics. Perhaps the showrunners failed to realize that insulting a large chunk of your overseas viewing audience isn’t the best way to win fans.


It could have been an extremely cool/creepy episode about giant spiders, but Chibnall wouldn’t allow it. As such, it’s the second in two back-to-back episodes to directly hurl a flaming volley at U.S. politics (more specifically Donald Trump), and further alienating 50% of the potential U.S. viewer base in the process. They say hindsight is 20/20. I’m not sure these guys realize it, yet.


The rampant misandry and emasculation of males continues in the series’ fifth episode, with typically Leftist attacks on perceived “male patriarchy” and the obvious revenge tactic: crafting a pregnant male character. It also bears the highly ironic distinction of championing capitalism and the drive to create better products….without even realizing it.


As per the Left’s prejudice and discrimination against whites (more specifically white males) and Christians, this episode once again demonizes all whites by focusing on the partition of India, while simultaneously allying itself (once again) with the religion of Islam. Regardless of your religious affiliation, this should be an extreme red flag to anyone allowing themselves to be whispered to by a radical Left who are pretending to champion “equality.”

11×07 – KERBLAM!

Pete McTighe took primary writing duties on this one in an attempt to lighten the tone of the series. Nevertheless, it quickly spirals into a mess of anti-capitalist messaging with a main villain that is (yes, you guessed it), a white male. The episode very clearly attacks Amazon and what it perceives as unfair treatment of workers and job loss to more automation, which historically has been proven woefully incorrect. The irony is lost on the writers, as Amazon offers a platform which allows literally anyone to sell products on its site and take advantage of massive exposure, which has saved potentially thousands of brick and mortar businesses from going under as the internet shift takes hold. Only a Left-leaning socialist could possibly see it otherwise.


Feminist Joy Wilkinson has the writing duties on this one, and it shows. The episode barely takes a single breath before reminding the audience (over and over) that women were oppressed in the old days. The message isn’t meant as a critique on the time period. It’s a direct, on-purpose attempt at connecting dots between those days, and the world we live in today. Never mind that women have never been more free and given the same opportunities as men than they have right now. According to Wilkinson and overlord Chris Chibnall, women haven’t budged an inch since the days when they were being falsely accused as witches and drowned/tortured.


Third wave Feminism rears its ugly head again in potentially the series’ most outrageously offensive episode, going into full attack mode on a traumatized single father (yes, he’s white) caught in an alternate dimension and believing himself to be in contact with his deceased wife. Jodie Whittaker’s performance in this episode is nothing short of menacing, and not in a good way. A noted feminist herself, Whittaker has made many misandrist statements in the press throughout the series run, and it’s clear that she had no trouble channeling that sentiment for this episode. In an age when the Left praises and champions single motherhood as a wonderful, courageous and admirable thing (which it isn’t, regardless of whether you’re a single mother OR a father), it’s absolutely hypocritical to go on the attack and tear down a character for nothing more than revenge against yet another white male.


The series goes out with a whimper in this last episode, which plagiarizes elements from previous Doctor Who episodes, while re-introducing the villain from the first episode. It’s an underwhelming finale without any sense of excitement or adventure, and the end result feels as if Chibnall and team simply ran out of energy and willpower after being so heavy-handed and miserable throughout the previous nine episodes. At least we’re spared any SJW propaganda on this one. It’s the closest the series gets to a traditional Who story, but that isn’t saying much.

Leftists in denial will undoubtedly loathe my take on the series, but that’s nothing new. In their world, you’re a racist, or a bigot, or any combination of meaningless, over-used and desaturated ad hominem attacks, just because you disagree with their politics. Doctor Who has never shied away from making commentary on certain issues in the past. Indeed, the Daleks were a direct and obvious reference to National Socialism and the rise of the Third Reich. The difference is that everyone could get behind this narrative, because it was a universal truth about the insidious dangers of radicalism. Fast forward 55+ years, and we have extreme radicals using suppressive, fascist methods to try and force everyone to agree with their personal take on the world’s major talking points. History seems to be repeating itself, and the BBC don’t seem to care. Every single hallmark of radical Leftism is on display during this season, and it’s shoved down the audience’s throats so harshly, so brutally and disrespectfully, that it’s a wonder why it has any ratings at all. Fan backlash is met with Ad Hominem attacks by the writers, and the cast, and nobody on the production side seems willing to realize that their strategy is failing, and costing the world one of the most iconic sci-fi franchises around.

There are less-than-subtle rumors floating around that Chris Chibnall and Jodie Whittaker will last one more season before making an exit, and they’ll no doubt do so with their middle fingers lifted in the direction of the fans. From the onset, Chibnall and Whittaker have been a tag team who aren’t afraid to proclaim (loudly) that they’re dead-set on doing away with everything Doctor Who stood for, in favor of a “fresh new take.” This, combined with Chibnall’s reluctant admittance that he is indeed pushing a social justice agenda, and it’s impossible for his supporters to use their typical tactics against those of us who are sick and tired of being preached to. The Left’s identity politics have infested every single part of our culture, and we sit down at home to escape it by watching good, old-fashioned adventure shows like Doctor Who. Evidently, that’s not enough for the Left, who are moving even more to the extreme Left with each passing day. This is an unsustainable recipe, and it shows clearly in the marked plummeting of the ratings for series 11. Naysayers were quick to point out that season 11’s ratings are actually up over previous episodes, which is true, but they’ve been in decline since the latter half of Matt Smith’s tenure as the Doctor, anyways. That’s not saying much. Those who tuned in this season were evidently willing to give a female Doctor a shot, so the anti-female argument holds literally no water, here. This is a case of blunt, insulting and offensive racism, misandry and disingenuous political arguments woven into a show where they have no place being. I’d be just as upset if right-wing conservative politics were injected into the show, as well. Keep it fun, say something meaningful from time to time, but do it in a way that we can later have rational, meaningful dialogue about the topic. This is coincidentally why Seth MacFarlane’s Orville series is getting such rave fan reviews right now, while Star Trek: Discovery (another franchise ruined by Leftist identity politics) has been thoroughly repulsed and given the cold shoulder by its fan base.

Get woke, go broke. It never fails.



Symbolism never lies, programmed hate from yet another Monarch puppet.




Fire everyone associated with this debacle: actors, writers, producers and the entire production staff.


1. Bring back Peter Capaldi and let him finish off his run as originally intended.

2. The Doctor is English, white and MALE. Start from scratch with a white male actor who can actually act, and IS THE DOCTOR (not a horrendously miscast, bad cos-play imposter),


3. Cancel the show entirely. No Doctor Who is better than this disaster. It truly ended in 2017 with Capaldi’s Doctor.

Of course, the BBC will not do this, because as everyone is realising… they are:

Trust me, you do not want to be “WOKE”.




Feminist Misandry Infests Doctor Who (2016) [YouTube]

The Vandalization of Doctor Who (2018) [YouTube]


If you have studied the material on this site and are aware of the subliminal symbolism encoded everywhere (including Doctor Who), the answer to WHO IS TO BLAME FOR THE CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF DOCTOR WHO is easy to see. Look at the symbolism in this post alone, connect the dots and all is revealed.

Sadly as the enemy continues to fallback and retreat, it has decided to ‘poison the well’, ‘salt the earth’ and destroy beloved franchise after franchise as a means of inflicting as much petty damage as they can. Look at what they are producing, listen to what they are saying, they just don’t care anymore… writers, actors, producers, studios, whole networks and major multi-national corporations are all under the same dark occult control.



As their ship continues to sink they want to drag as many down with them as possible.

My advice to all readers, switch off the TV/streaming service, throw away the Smart Phone and leave social media. You are under their constant surveillance (anything “Smart” = Surveillance), combined with their diseased soft mind control (News & Media), they want you to FEAR, FEAR, FEAR, FEAR… (now more than ever).

Drop the fear, it’s time to awaken.

the dark MonarKy – part 1, butterflies & black eyes


Queen Elizabeth II
Official Diamond Jubilee Portrait (2012)


Although not officially an organization, the “Black Eye” club refers to a growing number of politicians, celebrities, business elites, and heads of State who have suddenly and mysteriously wound up with black eyes. Although a few of them have sustained injuries to their right eye, the majority occur on the left.

It would appear that there are two main categories within the “Black Eye” Club.  Those seated firmly into positions of government/politics and those in the entertainment/Hollywood. Are there others in the fields of science, and military? I’m sure there are.



(British Royal Family, Husband of Queen Elizabeth II)



Official Explanation – the Palace gave a press release that he just woke up with the black eye.




(British Royal Family)


Official Explanation – Palace refused to comment.


(American Politician – Democrat)


Claims to have sustained a black eye and stitches from cutting his head on the edge of a glass shower door.


(American Politician – Democrat)


Official Explanation – Slipped and fell while running in the rain. Also suffered a dislocated shoulder.


Harry Reid’s second eye injury in 4 years.

Right eye, multiple bones around the eye, loss of eyesight, broken ribs, concussion.

Official Explanation – I know there are a lot of rumors as to what happened, but that’s very simple. My wife and I were in our new home. I was doing exercises that I’ve been doing for many years with those large rubber bands and, uh, one of them broke and spun me around and I crashed into these cabinets and injured my eye.


(American Politician – Democrat)


Official Explanation – Black eyes received from sustaining a broken nose while playing Ice hockey.


(American Politician – Democrat, Former President)


Jimmy Carter joined the Black Eye Club at 95 years of age when he appeared on stage at Ryman Auditorium in Nashville TN for a Habitat for Humanity project. President Carter claims a fall at his house earlier in the day (Oct 6th) is the cause for the injury which required 14 stitches.



(American Politician, Former President)


Official Explanation – Choked on a pretzel, fainted and fell off the couch and hit the floor.  According to Dr. Abdul Giwa, an emergency room doctor at St. Lutes=Roosevelt Hospital, the President likely fell victim to “vasovagal syndrome, “a rare occurrence in which the vagus nerve, which regulates heart rate, is stimulated and the signal slows the heart. Victims can pass out, and they often look pale afterward.

“It can be brought on by a number of causes, usually stress, but also swallowing something,” Giwa said. “As food goes down through the esophagus, it passes by the vagus nerve.”



(American Politician)


Official Explanation – Mayo Clinic surgeons took out the 5-centimeter blood clot during “a minimally invasive craniotomy with an eyebrow incision,” according to a Mayo Clinic Hospital statement released by McCain’s office.


(Irish Politician, Minister for Finance)


Official Explanation – The Department of finance stated that Noonan underwent eye surgery but refused to elaborate further. A Dr. Gray diagnosed he had a unilateral exophthalmos or proptosis, otherwise known as bulging of the eye.  This was supposedly his second surgery on his eye in a couple years.


(Head of the Catholic Church)


Official Explanation – Hit his face on the Pope Mobile.


(Former Head of the Catholic Church)


Official Explanation – The Pope fell.


(British Entrepreneur)


Official Explanation – The entrepreneur was cycling in the dark on Virgin Gorda, one of the British Virgin Islands, with his children, when he hit a bump in the road, causing him to be flung over his handlebars.


(British Chef)


Official Explanation – Fell down the stairs at his home.


(American Actor)


Official Explanation – No explanation was given.



(Canadian Actor)


Official Explanation – Make-up. However, he sustained another black eye when hit by Harrison Ford in a “stunt gone wrong” while filming Blade Runner years later.


(American Actress)


Official Explanation – Involved in a car accident.


(American Actor)


Official Explanation – Bar room brawl.


(American Actor)


Official Explanation – Kickboxing accident.


(American Singer)


Madona’s publicist Liz Rosenberg said.  “She was playing peekaboo with her baby, I’m almost embarrassed to tell you about it because it sounds so cute. But that’s what happened.” She went on to explain that she was bouncing her 18-month-old daughter Lourdes on her lap when the child’s head smacked into the bone under her eye.


(British Actress/Singer)


Official Explanation – The contents of her cupboard fell out and on top of her head.


(American Singer)


Official Explanation – Got hit in the face with a pole during a performance.


(Canadian Singer)


Official Explanation – Fighting.


(American Rapper)


Official Explanation – Got punched in a random game of knockout after leaving a nightclub.




For those who wish to look at things from an occult or symbolism perspective, the answer to this “Black Eye” Club can be found by de-occulting the symbolism.

(The “Eye” of Providence)

The “Eye” is an occult symbol long associated with the SUN.


For the purposes of this article, a “Black Eye” is then in turn a dark-occult symbol for the BLACK SUN. Where we can see the victims are being openly yet secretly branded with a hidden claim of ownership by the cult of the BLACK SUN (aka. The Dark Side).

A hard punch in the face is one of many methods of inflicting TRAUMA upon a victim. At the end of the day this is all about CONTROL.

The Eye of Providence – U.S. 1 Dollar Bill
(Symbol associated with the “Cabal / Illuminati / Deep State”)

Click on image for a larger size




For other theories and to read the original article, proceed to the The Phoenix Enigma.

Additional photos and a deeper mythologically based theory can be found at the following site:


ESSENTIAL READING: The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave (Project Monarch)

Fritz Springmeier - The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave-Promo

HS: Essential reading for all who wish to truly comprehend
the dark reality of Monarch Programming.

The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave


by Cisco Wheeler and Fritz Springmeier

This book is dedicated to the two million Americans and counting who have been programmed with Monarch-type trauma-based mind control. This book is written to destroy trauma-based mind control before it destroys the human race. It’s time for this horrendous secret to end.

Blood, sweat and tears are associated with this book. The blood of the innocent victims of this mind-control cries out in a single unison, along with the pungent sweat of those who have tried to minister help to the shattered humanity left by the sadistic programmers, and the pools of tears shed as this book was written, “How long, O Lord, holy and true, do you not judge and avenge our blood on earth?”


IF THERE IS ANY CHANCE you the reader have had mind-control done to you, you must consider the following book to be DANGEROUS. If you are consulting a therapist for DID (also known as MPD), it is recommended that you consult your therapist before reading this book. The complications that could result for those under mind control learning the truth–could be fatal. The co-authors take no responsibility for those who read or misuse this information.

The reader’s mind is like a garden. It may not be time to plant the truth in your mind. Perhaps you need some weeding or ground preparation, before the garden of your mind is ready. Perhaps the weather is too stormy to plant the truth. Pray to the Lord of the Harvest. The blessings that flow from planting the information of this book in your mind, will require the presence of living waters of love. If you do not have love in your heart, this book is not for you. The information contained in this book is the biggest news-story of the 20th century, and still the biggest secret. It will challenge you, shock you, horrify you and hopefully motivate you to redouble your efforts to humble yourself and seek strength from God.

Read Book Online »




  1. The Selection & Preparation of the Victim
  2. The Traumatization & Torture of the Victim
  3. The Use of Drugs
  4. The Use of Hypnosis
  5. The Skill of Lying, The Art of Deceit
  6. The Use of Electricity & Electronics
  7. Engineering & Structuring Of An MPD System
  8. Body Manipulation & Programming
  9. Mind Manipulation by Psychological Programming Methods: Behavior Modification, Psychological Motivation & NLP
  10. Spiritual Control Techniques, Possession, Trances, Etc.
  11. Internal Controls
  12. External Controls


Educate Yourself – Share Information – Raise Awareness

The Hidden Life of Marilyn Monroe: The Original Hollywood Mind Control Slave

The Hidden Life of Marilyn Monroe-Promo

Marilyn Monroe is possibly the most iconic figure in American culture and the most recognizable sex symbol of all times. However, behind Monroe’s photogenic smile was a fragile individual who was exploited and subjected to mind control by powerful handlers. A two part series that looks at the hidden life of Marilyn, a Hollywood Monarch slave.

Continue Reading »

PROJECT MONARCH: Sex Kitten Beta Programming

Project Monarch - Sex Kitten Beta Programming


Monarch Programming is a method of hard mind control used by numerous organizations for covert purposes. It is a continuation of project MK-ULTRA, a mind-control program developed by the CIA, and tested on the military and civilians. The methods are astonishingly sadistic (its entire purpose is to traumatize the victim) and the expected results are horrifying: The creation of a mind-controlled slave who can be triggered at anytime to perform any action required by the handler… Continue Reading »



Beta is referred to as “sexual” programming (slaves). This programming eliminates all learned moral convictions and stimulates the primitive instinct, devoid of inhibitions. “Cat” alters may come out at this level. Known as Kitten programming, it is the most visible kind of programming as some all female celebrities, models, actresses and singers have been subjected to this kind of programming. In popular culture, clothing with feline prints often denote Kitten programming.



DELTA PROGRAMMING: US Police Have Killed Over 5,000 Civilians Since 9/11

Mint Press News presents:

US Police

Statistically speaking, Americans should be more
fearful of the local cops than “terrorists.”

Though Americans commonly believe law enforcement’s role in society is to protect them and ensure peace and stability within the community, the sad reality is that police departments are often more focused on enforcing laws, making arrests and issuing citations. As a result of this as well as an increase in militarized policing techniques, Americans are eight times more likely to be killed by a police officer than by a terrorist, estimates a Washington’s Blog report based on official statistical data.

Though the U.S. government does not have a database collecting information about the total number of police involved shootings each year, it’s estimated that between 500 and 1,000 Americans are killed by police officers each year. Since 9/11, about 5,000 Americans have been killed by U.S. police officers, which is almost equivalent to the number of U.S. soldiers who have been killed in the line of duty in Iraq.

Because individual police departments are not required to submit information regarding the use of deadly force by its officers, some bloggers have taken it upon themselves to aggregate that data. Wikipedia also has a list of “justifiable homicides” in the U.S., which was created by documenting publicized deaths.

Mike Prysner, one of the local directors of the Los Angeles chapter for ANSWER — an advocacy group that asks the public to Act Now to Stop War and End Racism — told Mint Press News earlier this year that the “epidemic” of police harassment and violence is a nationwide issue.

He said groups like ANSWER are trying to hold officers accountable for abuse of power. “[Police brutality] has been an issue for a very long time,” Prysner said, explaining that in May, 13 people were killed in Southern California by police.

As Mint Press News previously reported, each year there are thousands of claims of police misconduct. According to the CATO Institute’s National Police Misconduct Reporting Project, in 2010 there were 4,861 unique reports of police misconduct involving 6,613 sworn officers and 6,826 alleged victims.

Most of those allegations of police brutality involved officers who punched or hit victims with batons, but about one-quarter of the reported cases involved firearms or stun guns.


A big element in the police killings, Prysner says, is racism. “A big majority of those killed are Latinos and Black people,” while the police officers are mostly White, he said. “It’s a badge of honor to shoot gang members so [the police] go out and shoot people who look like gang members,” Prysner argued, giving the example of 34-year-old Rigoberto Arceo, who was killed by police on May 11.

According to a report from the Los Angeles Times, Arceo, who was a biomedical technician at St. Francis Medical Center, was shot and killed after getting out of his sister’s van. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department says Arceo “advanced on the deputy and attempted to take the deputy’s gun.” However, Arceo’s sister and 53-year-old Armando Garcia — who was barbecuing in his yard when the incident happened — say that Arceo had his hands above his head the entire time.

Prysner is not alone in his assertion that race is a major factor in officer-related violence. This past May, a study from the the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement, an anti-racist activist organization, found that police officers, security guards or self-appointed vigilantes killed at least 313 Black people in 2012 — meaning one Black person was killed in the U.S. by law enforcement roughly every 28 hours.

Prysner said the relationship between police departments and community members needs to change and that when police shoot an unarmed person with their arms in the air over their head, the officer should be punished.


“You cannot have a police force that is investigating and punishing itself,” Prysner said, adding that taxpayer money should be invested into the community instead of given to police to buy more guns, assault rifles and body armor.

Dissatisfied with police departments’ internal review policies, some citizens have formed volunteer police watch groups to prevent the so-called “Blue Code of Silence” effect and encourage police officers to speak out against misconduct occurring within their department.

As Mint Press News previously reported, a report released earlier this year found that of the 439 cases of police misconduct that then had been brought before the Minneapolis’s year-old misconduct review board, not one of the police officers involved has been disciplined.

Although the city of Minneapolis spent $14 million in payouts for alleged police misconduct between 2006 and 2012, despite the fact that the Minneapolis Police Department often concluded that the officers involved in those cases did nothing wrong.

Other departments have begun banning equipment such as Tasers, but those decisions were likely more about protecting the individual departments from lawsuits than ensuring that officers are not equipped with weapons that cause serious and sometimes fatal injuries when used.

To ensure officers are properly educated on how to use their weapons and are aware of police ethics, conflict resolution and varying cultures within a community, police departments have historically held training programs for all officers. But due to tighter budgets and a shift in priorities, many departments have not provided the proper continuing education training programs for their officers.

Charles Ramsey, president of both the Major Cities Chiefs Association and the Police Executive Research Forum, called that a big mistake, explaining that it is essential officers are trained and prepared for high-stress situations:

“Not everybody is going to be able to make those kinds of good decisions under pressure, but I do think that the more reality-based training that we provide, the more we put people in stressful situations to make them respond and make them react.”


In order to help local police officers protect themselves while fighting the largely unsuccessful War on Drugs, the federal government passed legislation in 1994 allowing the Pentagon to donate surplus military equipment from the Cold War to local police departments. Meaning that “weaponry designed for use on a foreign battlefield has been handed over for use on American streets … against American citizens.”

So while the U.S. military fights the War on Terror abroad, local police departments are fighting another war at home with some of the same equipment as U.S. troops, and protocol that largely favors officers in such tactics as no-knock raids.

Radley Balko, author of “Rise of the Warrior Cop,” wrote in the Wall Street Journal in August:

“Since the 1960s, in response to a range of perceived threats, law-enforcement agencies across the U.S., at every level of government, have been blurring the line between police officer and soldier.

“Driven by martial rhetoric and the availability of military-style equipment—from bayonets and M-16 rifles to armored personnel carriers—American police forces have often adopted a mind-set previously reserved for the battlefield. The war on drugs and, more recently, post-9/11 antiterrorism efforts have created a new figure on the U.S. scene: the warrior cop—armed to the teeth, ready to deal harshly with targeted wrongdoers, and a growing threat to familiar American liberties.”

As Mint Press News previously reported, statistics from an FBI report released in September reveal that a person is arrested on marijuana-related charges in the U.S. every 48 seconds, on average — most were for simple possession charges.

According to the FBI’s report, there were more arrests for marijuana possession than for the violent crimes of murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery and aggravated assault — 658,231 compared with 521,196 arrests.

While groups that advocate against police brutality recognize and believe that law enforcement officials should be protected while on duty, many say that local police officers do not need to wear body armor, Kevlar helmets and tactical equipment vests — all while carrying assault weapons.

“We want the police to keep up with the latest technology. That’s critical,” American Civil Liberties Union senior counsel Kara Dansky said. “But policing should be about protection, not combat.”

According to the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, there are more than 900,000 sworn law enforcement officers in the United States. In 2012, 120 officers were killed in the line of duty. The deadliest day in law enforcement history was reportedly Sept. 11, 2001, when 72 officers were killed.

Despite far fewer officers dying in the line of duty compared with American citizens, police departments are not only increasing their use of protective and highly volatile gear, but are increasingly setting aside a portion of their budget to invest in new technology such as drones, night vision goggles, remote robots, surveillance cameras, license plate readers and armored vehicles that amount to unarmed tanks.

Though some officers are on board with the increased militarization and attend conferences such as the annual Urban Shield event, others have expressed concern with the direction the profession is heading.

For example, former Arizona police officer Jon W. McBride said police concerns about being “outgunned” were likely a “self-fulfilling prophecy.” He added that “if not expressly prohibited, police managers will continually push the arms race,” because “their professional literature is predominately [sic] based on the acquiring and use of newer weapons and more aggressive techniques to physically overwhelm the public. In many cases, however, this is the opposite of smart policing.”

“Coupled with the paramilitary design of the police bureaucracy itself, the police give in to what is already a serious problem in the ranks: the belief that the increasing use of power against a citizen is always justified no matter the violation. The police don’t understand that in many instances they are the cause of the escalation and bear more responsibility during an adverse outcome.

“The suspects I encountered as a former police officer and federal agent in nearly all cases granted permission for me to search their property when asked, often despite unconcealed contraband. Now, instead of making a simple request of a violator, many in law enforcement seem to take a more difficult and confrontational path, fearing personal risk. In many circumstances they inflame the citizens they are engaging, thereby needlessly putting themselves in real and increased jeopardy.”

Another former police officer who wished to remain anonymous agreed with McBride and told Balko,

“American policing really needs to return to a more traditional role of cops keeping the peace; getting out of police cars, talking to people, and not being prone to overreaction with the use of firearms, tasers, or pepper spray. … Don’t get me wrong, I’ve been in more than my share tussles and certainly appreciate the dangers of police work, but as Joseph Wambaugh famously said, the real danger is psychological, not physical.”

Source | Originally Posted: November 6, 2013




RoboCop (1987) reveals the full spectrum deployment of Delta (Killer/Assassin) Programming across Law Enforcement via Project Monarch since the 1980’s.

Chick image below to view the evidence:

RoboCop (1987) Decoded


Monarch Programming is a method of hard mind control used by numerous organizations for covert purposes. It is a continuation of project MK-ULTRA, a mind-control program developed by the CIA, and tested on the military and civilians. The methods are astonishingly sadistic (its entire purpose is to traumatize the victim) and the expected results are horrifying: The creation of a mind-controlled slave who can be triggered at anytime to perform any action required by the handler… Continue Reading »


Project Monarch - RoboCop (1987) - Delta Programming

“Delta” City is a subliminal reference to Delta Programming.
“…Silver Lining
is referring to RoboCop’s metallic (silver) exterior.
The Future = Now


DELTA is known as “killer” programming and was originally developed for training special agents or elite soldiers (i.e. Delta Force, First Earth Battalion, Mossad, etc.) in covert operations. Optimal adrenal output and controlled aggression is evident. Subjects are devoid of fear and very systematic in carrying out their assignment. Self-destruct or suicide instructions are layered in at this level.



Lindsey Stirling’s “Shatter Me” : A Video About Monarch Programming (Vigilant Citizen)

Vigilant Citizen - Shatter Me-Promo




Lindsey Stirling is not your typical pop star because, for one, she’s a violinist. However, looking at the imagery of her video “Shatter Me”, we realize that there is not much differentiating her from other pop acts:  Her most successful single is indeed all about Monarch mind control. We’ll look at the symbolism of “Shatter Me”.

Shatter Me is proof that the Illuminati Agenda is not only imposed on big-time mainstream acts, but also on artists who appeal to “niche” markets [HS: No one escapes the butterfly]. Lindsey Stirling is a violinist and a dancer who became a YouTube sensation with over four million subscribers and 600 million total views. In 2010 she was a quarter-finalist on the show America’s Got Talent, where she was known as the “hip-hop violinist”. Stirling is involved with the LDS Church and was featured in their “I’m a Mormon” campaign. She was also asked to perform in other important events organized by the LDS Church.

In 2013, she signed with Lady Gaga’s manager, Troy Carter, and released her second album, Shatter Me, in May 2014. The album reached the second position on the Billboard 200 and reached #1 in four categories: Top US digital album, top classical album, top dance/electronic album and top independent album.

Although Stirling is not a Lady Gaga-type artist, the symbolism of her video Shatter Me exploits the same themes as Gaga: Monarch mind control. In fact, it is one of the most blatant Monarch-themed videos in recent memory as it taps into pretty much all of the symbolism associated with it. Also, beyond the flashing of images and symbols, the entire story of the video is actually the story of a Monarch victim subject to trauma and dissociating from reality.

Scroll to the bottom of the following page to Continue Reading >

Katy Perry – Dark Horse (2014) [Music Video]

Katy Perry - Logo
Katy Perry - 2014 - Dark Horse-tb


Katy Perry – Wide Awake (2012) [Music Video]

Katy Perry - Logo
Katy Perry - 2012 - Wide Awake-tb


Originally Posted: Feb 21, 2014

Katy Perry – Last Friday Night (T.G.I.F.) (2011) [Music Video]

Katy Perry - Logo
Katy Perry - 2011 - Last Friday Night (T.G.I.F.)-tb


Originally Posted: Feb 21, 2014

Katy Perry – California Gurls (2010) [Music Video]

Katy Perry - Logo
Katy Perry - 2010 - California Gurls-tb


Originally Posted: Feb 22, 2014

Katy Perry – Firework (2010) [Music Video]

Katy Perry - Logo
Katy Perry - 2010 - Firework-tb


Originally Posted: Feb 22, 2014